What is the movie Alexander about?
The story is an epic that is as daring and ambitious as its subject, a relentless conqueror who by the age of 32 had amassed the greatest empire the world had ever seen. Past and present collide to form the puzzle of the protagonist, a tapestry of triumphs and tragedies in which childhood memories and Alexander’s rise to power unfold side by side with the later day expansion of his empire, and its ultimate downfall.Alexander / Film synopsis
Is the movie Alexander based on a true story?
Alexander is a 2004 epic historical drama film based on the life of the ancient Macedonian general and king Alexander the Great. It was directed by Oliver Stone and starred Colin Farrell.
Is Alexander a good movie?
Alexander was not a successful film. IMDb rates it at a lowly 5.6, Rotten Tomatoes has a truly damning critic rating of 16% and a slightly better audience rating of 35%. For a director of the stature like Oliver Stone that must hurt.
Was Brad Pitt in Alexander the Great?
Brad Pitt was considered for the role of Hephaistion. He turned down the role due to personal concerns with the character. Alexander is commonly depicted in statues with eyes raised upwards towards the sun and, hence, led to the many visual references of Alexander (Colin Farrell) always looking towards the sun.
How does the movie Alexander end?
At the end, Alexander lies in his own blood watching his men die fighting for him, his horse die trying to protect him, and his best friend wounded severely after following his mad charge. This is not a great leader.
Who defeated Alexander?
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Sunday (November 14) said that Chandragupta Maurya, who founded the Mauryan empire in the 4th century BC, had defeated Alexander of Macedon in battle — and yet, it is the latter whom historians have chosen to call “great”.
How historically accurate was Alexander?
Apart from a tendency to view Macedonians and Greeks as one people, the film is more or less historically accurate—aided and abetted by the Oxford scholar Robin Lane Fox, who has no doubt disgraced himself among his colleagues by penning a “making of” book.